Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

F
e
b
.
2
0
2
0
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
C
o
r
n
e
r
|
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
a
n
d
e
n
a
b
l
e
r
s
f
o
r
p
r
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
b
u
r
n
s
f
o
r
w
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
m
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a

One of the barriers cited by Miller et al. were “resource-related” so we wanted to know if she sees the Forest Resilience Bond as a possible enabler to counter those barriers.

Authors: Rebecca K. Miller, Christopher B. Field, Katharine J. Mach

Interview and story by: Peter Wyrsch

 

Written by Rebecca K. Miller, Christopher B. Field and Katharine J. Mach and recently published in Nature Sustainability Journal, the article “Barriers and enablers for prescribed burns for wildfire management in California,” asserts that prescribed burns to reduce fuel can mitigate the risk of catastrophic wildfires. However, multiple barriers limit their deployment, resulting in their underutilization. The article evaluates the sociopolitical barriers and opportunities for greater deployment in California.

We had the opportunity to chat with Rebecca Miller about her research and thoughts on the Forest Resilience Bond…

“California has a massive wildfire problem but there’s no no-fire solution to the issue” she said. “We need to be using every tool in our toolbox – prescribed burns, mechanical thinning, and even manage wildfires in remote areas and we need to be matching our treatment types to local ecological conditions. If we can increase our fuel treatment we may be able to start incorporating fire much more into wildfire solutions for California.”

One of the barriers cited by Miller et al. were “resource-related” so we wanted to know if she sees the Forest Resilience Bond as a possible enabler to counter those barriers. She explained that “addressing limited funding and personnel issues which can prohibit the use of prescribed fire in national forest land could be an excellent way to increase the use of prescribed burns.”

“One of the enablers that I found was having collaboration between non-profit organizations and policy makers as well as government agencies. The Forest Resilience Bond is a prime example of that kind of collaboration in action,” she added.